SR&ED and the C-15 legislative changes: what’s different in 2025

scene-diplomats-signing-international-treaty-agreement

Canada’s SR&ED program underwent its most significant structural update in years through Bill C-15 and subsequent regulatory changes. For companies that have been filing SR&ED claims under the old rules, understanding what changed — and what didn’t — is essential for accurate 2025 planning.

Background: why the changes were made

The federal government has signalled for several years that SR&ED needed modernization. The core concerns were that the program was not keeping pace with the shift toward knowledge-economy and software-driven R&D, that administrative complexity was deterring smaller companies from claiming, and that the credit structure needed to better reflect how innovation actually happens in Canadian companies today.

Key changes under C-15

  • Capital expenditure treatment: The previous rules excluded most capital expenditures from SR&ED eligibility. C-15 reintroduced limited capital cost allowance provisions for SR&ED-dedicated equipment and facilities, subject to specific conditions. Companies with significant physical R&D infrastructure should review whether previously excluded capital costs may now be partially eligible.
  • Contractor payment rates: The eligible rate for arm’s-length contractor payments has been adjusted. The previous 80% inclusion rate for third-party contractor costs remains the baseline, but new rules around documented scope of work and contractor confirmation of SR&ED activities have been tightened. Contracts without clear SR&ED scope specifications are increasingly at risk of full disallowance.
  • Expenditure limit phase-out: The phase-out range for the enhanced 35% CCPC rate has been adjusted. The $10M–$50M taxable capital range that governed the phase-out has been updated — companies near those thresholds should recalculate their expected ITC rate for 2025.
  • Documentation standards: CRA has issued updated guidance on contemporaneous documentation standards that accompanied C-15. The guidance formalizes expectations that were previously communicated informally through review decisions, making strong documentation practices more explicitly required.

💡 What did not change: the four-part eligibility test, the fundamental distinction between refundable and non-refundable credits, the 18-month filing deadline, and the core categories of eligible expenditures (salaries, materials, overhead). The program’s structure is intact — the changes are targeted adjustments, not a redesign.

What this means for your 2025 filing

Companies filing SR&ED for fiscal years ending in 2025 should review their claims against the updated rules — particularly around contractor documentation, capital cost eligibility, and the expenditure limit calculation if their taxable capital is in the $10M–$50M range.

For most small and mid-sized CCPCs with straightforward claims, the practical impact of C-15 is limited. The changes matter most for companies with significant contractor spend, physical research infrastructure, or taxable capital approaching the phase-out thresholds.

Getting current advice

Legislative changes in the SR&ED context can be nuanced — the regulatory text and CRA’s administrative positions sometimes diverge from the plain language of the legislation. Before finalizing your 2025 claim, confirm that your SR&ED consultant or tax advisor is working from the updated rules, not prior-year assumptions.

About The Author

Dale Doering

Dale Doering is the owner of SRED Consultants Inc., helping businesses navigate the complexities of Scientific Research and Experimental Development (SR&ED) claims. With a strong understanding of the technical and interpretive requirements of the SR&ED program, Dale works with companies to identify eligible projects, document technological challenges, and clearly demonstrate the systematic experimentation or analysis undertaken to achieve advancement. His approach focuses on translating complex technical work into well-supported SR&ED claims, helping clients maximize eligible opportunities while maintaining a clear understanding of the program’s requirements.

Recent Posts

Frequently Asked Questions

What was the main motivation behind the Bill C-15 legislative updates to the SR&ED program?

The federal government modernized the SR&ED program to better address the shift toward a knowledge-economy and software-driven R&D. Key concerns included reducing administrative complexity to encourage smaller companies to claim, and updating the credit structure to accurately reflect modern innovation practices in Canada.

While previous rules excluded most capital expenditures from SR&ED eligibility, Bill C-15 reintroduced limited capital cost allowance provisions specifically for SR&ED-dedicated equipment and facilities under certain conditions. Companies with physical R&D infrastructure should review their costs to see if previously excluded expenses are now partially eligible.

The baseline 80% inclusion rate for third-party contractor costs remains in effect, but documentation rules have become much stricter. Contractors and companies must now provide a clearly documented scope of work and contractor confirmation of SR&ED activities. Contracts lacking explicit SR&ED scope specifications face a higher risk of full disallowance.

Bill C-15 introduced targeted adjustments rather than a full redesign. Several core elements remain untouched, including:

– The four-part eligibility test

– The fundamental distinction between refundable and non-refundable credits

– The 18-month filing deadline

– Core eligible expenditure categories (salaries, materials, and overhead)

For most small and mid-sized CCPCs with straightforward claims, the practical impact is limited. The changes primarily affect companies with significant contractor spend, physical research infrastructure, or taxable capital approaching the $10M–$50M expenditure limit phase-out thresholds.

Related Post